Out of topic, it was never mentioned in the passage The passage doesn't talk about the lack of leverage with traditional tools Off track answer, the passage doesn't talk about repair of the damage. The author clarifies the doubts in the mind of reader by nullifying the issue with the traditional tools and fits in well after 'but also because' The author is trying to cover a new point after 'but also because' hence will not repeat the victim issue againĬorrect. Does the tool need to perform these functions to rescue? The passage already cites an issue with these tools So the line of thinking is Traditional tool cause additional structural damage and creates spark so frightening to crash victims while hydraulic tools are less frightening to crash victims.Īnother reason in the same line should be the answer.Ĭhoice A is taking about the function but not why using one hydraulic is better than using two traditional tools so can not be the answer.Ĭhoice B is just the repetition of point 2 above and hence can’t be the answer.Ĭhoice C talks about how hydraulic tool is better in the same line as point 1 and 2 and hence is the best choice.Ĭhoice D is again out of scope as passage is not taking about vehicle but about rescue of victims.Ĭhoice E is not direct enough to give a good reason as compared to choice C. Hydraulic tools are less frightening to crash victims. Traditional tools could cause additional structural damage or create sparks.Ģ. Now the author has given following as reasons why Hydraulic tools are preferred:ġ. In these kind of question we need to look for a choice which takes passage to logical conclusion. not concerned with repairing.Į) Emergency response workers have greater leverage when using hydraulic tools than when using traditional tools, such as crowbars and circular rrect. this means hydraulic tools does not complicate the danger in the way traditional tools did BUT it does complicate in some other manner.ĭ) Hydraulic tools are able to quickly and efficiently repair structural damage to vehicles involved in collisions. Emergency response workers prefer hydraulic tools, not only because they are less frightening to crash victims, but also becauseĪ One hydraulic rescue tool can perform the functions of both a crowbar and a circular saw.ī Hydraulic tools are quieter and do not cause crash victims to panic.Ĭ Hydraulic tools are unlikely to complicate an already dangerous situation in the way that more traditional tools often did.ĭ Hydraulic tools are able to quickly and efficiently repair structural damage to vehicles involved in collisions.Į Emergency response workers have greater leverage when using hydraulic tools than when using traditional tools, such as crowbars and circular saws.Įmergency response workers prefer hydraulic tools, not only because they are less frightening to crash victims, but also because.Ī) One hydraulic rescue tool can perform the functions of both a crowbar and a circular saw.this means there is one hydraulic tool that performs the function of the two other tools.too specific.ī) Hydraulic tools are quieter and do not cause crash victims to panic.already stated in the first part of the sentence.Ĭ) Hydraulic tools are unlikely to complicate an already dangerous situation in the way that more traditional tools often did. Hydraulic tools have often completely replaced traditional tools, such as crowbars and circular saws, which could cause additional structural damage or create sparks. Hydraulic rescue tools, colloquially known as Jaws of Life, are used by emergency response personnel to remove crash victims from damaged vehicles. Which of the following best completes the passage?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |